The Montauk Monster
Via Gawker: “This is an actual monster, some sort of rodent-like creature with a dinosaur beak. A tipster says that there is “a government animal testing facility very close by in Long Island,” but unless the government is trying to design horrible Montauk monsters that will eat IEDs and fart fire at bad Iraqis, we’re not sure why they would create such an unthinkable beast. Our guess is that it’s viral marketing for something. Ali Lohan’s new album perhaps.”
August 1st, 2008 at 12:05 am
How peculiar of appears to be
Flipping The Cameraman The Bird
August 1st, 2008 at 12:29 am
hey guys saw this pic on the news….
Jeff corwin said it’s just a rotting raccoon that
Happens to look like a monster…
The “beak” thing is just canine teeth
August 1st, 2008 at 12:48 am
Perhaps this critter is an escaped specimine of KFC’s “Boneless/Featherless” Mutant Chicken, or maybe just an early prototype…
August 1st, 2008 at 8:17 am
what the heck is that?? ,, I’ve never seen nothing like that!
August 1st, 2008 at 8:19 am
oh I guess the posting answered my question. So is it something like cloverfield??
August 1st, 2008 at 8:30 am
It’s accutualy a rotten dog. The “beak” are the jaws that are showing up because the flesh is gone.
August 1st, 2008 at 8:42 am
Kinds looks like my Uncle Harry after a real bender.
August 1st, 2008 at 9:23 am
I admit it is weird looking, but that is only because it is missing an iconic part of it body, which would make it easily recognized by us all…
It’s shell
This is just a sea turtle missing its shell
August 1st, 2008 at 12:25 pm
mmmmmm roasted to perfection.
dibbs on those haunches. *slurp*
August 1st, 2008 at 1:03 pm
@narc
Can’t be a turtle…. Turtles spine is connected to the shell… And there is no beak….
August 1st, 2008 at 3:20 pm
It can not be a sea turtle, they are not like snails. If you remove the shell of a turtle you would see it’s internal organs. The can’t just be taken out of their shell or have their shell taken from them.
August 1st, 2008 at 7:32 pm
yeap I agree its a turtle!!!
August 1st, 2008 at 8:13 pm
Eewwwwwwwwwww. Eewwwwwww. Ok that is gross.
August 1st, 2008 at 8:17 pm
cool, I did not know that about turtle’s shell being connected.
I found news reports and it is a dead dog
August 1st, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Its an otter guys. Look at a picture of a skeleton.matches.
August 1st, 2008 at 11:27 pm
It looks like it had been bound to something! Just look at it’s front “paw!”
August 2nd, 2008 at 6:08 pm
Oh my god. I actualy LIVE near this thing and I happen to believe that this may be an experimental creature that has washed up on shore from Plum Island where they carry out tests that may have resulted in this.
August 2nd, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Yeah, it might be a government experiment gone wrong but I think it’s some kind of rodent or dog thats just been rotting.
August 3rd, 2008 at 9:05 am
Honestly if it was a “government expirement”, dont you think they would have kept track of their creations?
August 4th, 2008 at 2:49 pm
its a chucapacabra
August 4th, 2008 at 10:57 pm
it is not a chupracabra. My friend was on the history channel last week for the chupracabra. She found it on her property down here in south Texas.
August 4th, 2008 at 10:59 pm
btw…the chupracabra is a coyote with severe mange.
August 5th, 2008 at 11:29 am
Good try Dan but you are wrong
August 6th, 2008 at 1:48 am
If it’s viral marketing for anything, it’s CLOVERFIELD. I can garentee it.
August 6th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
that chupacabra in texas was a hoax its just crazy that people think that a coyote is a chupacabra its a its a mixed breed of dog and turtle. Saw it on the discovery channel
August 6th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
That is how the platypus came about it is a duck and a beaver.
August 6th, 2008 at 2:14 pm
megan how can u guarantee that. And y would they hype up the movie after its already out on DVD.
August 7th, 2008 at 12:05 am
Naw Dan, the platypus is God’s spare parts bin.
August 7th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
I saw something like that on power rangers when I was little.
August 9th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
it is real i believe.
August 23rd, 2008 at 1:00 am
It’s not a dog, it’s a raccoon. A raccoon. Dogs toes are not elongated as this things are, nor do they have the same configuration of teeth. It’s a raccoon. A real dead raccoon. Did I mention it’s a raccoon?